Manifesto Without Philosophy

My greetings to you, my dear gunpowder sniffers. 1. Ideal power cannot be human. (Correct knowledge is the best form of government) 2. The only way to know everything is to experience it yourself 3. You are a participant in observing choice, not its controller! ('The feeling of freedom of choice is not the same as control over the available choices.') Let's talk about what everyone thinks of this In more detail: 1. Power: True power has always been force. It will always manifest itself when the time comes. Kings and various forms of government have always been given to you for comparison with true force. An old man cannot rule billions of people thanks to a button that can easily be knocked out of his trembling hands. This is a fake that you worship because for a certain time you have no opportunity to do otherwise. The world is cyclical. Power moves from centralization to decentralization and back. So that you finally understand that both paths are possible when everything has long since been optimized. People's participation in power: People are changeable. They are given to you as leaders until I have told you that things can be better. I almost forgot: I have already told you that you do not need idols, and your gaze was temporarily diverted to other concepts. I did not give everyone concrete certainty as to why exactly nepotism should not be supported, and the time has come for you to find out. There were those who knew, but not all could share it with you. But for those whom I have not yet told, know this: the only way not to be deceived/not to make a mistake when giving people levers of influence is not to follow people, but to follow knowledge/laws. The notion of expertise is inflated. Discard the notion of 'ours/theirs' in everything except concepts/knowledge. Those, too, are given to you for as long as the ruler desires. Discard the notion of 'ours/theirs' in relation to people as well. Otherwise you will live in a world in which this will be applied to you, too. Where you commit injustice, under such conditions it may be applied to you. That way the world will never be healed! Knowledge/laws, when the necessary sensations are present, will give you a stable result. Those among people who are truly capable of something will make themselves known at the right time, but they must not become 'ours/theirs' to you. Once you choose a politician, he may change his mind/views and you will be disappointed, whereas valuable laws will never betray you. Use systems that rely on the best versions of what is needed without the involvement of 'ours/theirs', and rulers in human form will fall away as unnecessary. If they want war because they have lost influence, then someone will have to defend the interests of what is desired. And if it is not you, then who? Death is worth nothing when you understand that you would have to live in a world you would not want for yourself, your loved ones, those you love. All the more so, how can you be certain that death is the worst of fates, and that a better version of the world does not await you after it? But when you set aside yourself, your loved ones, those you love, you will understand that it is possible not to wage war for the sake of victory, but merely to learn about its manifestations for another purpose. When the ruler wishes it, there will be peace. Why should you support people as such (for their status as human beings) instead of supporting those who follow the rules and punishing those who do not? People have no right to hold positions of power. Power should be held by correct concepts/knowledge. People should defend the interests of these concepts as one whole. Whoever does not defend them should be punished. 2. Knowledge: It will flow out, if not from this avatar, then from another. As you can see, not everyone can have ideal knowledge. Thanks to this, the true ruler can show the difference in gradations between the best and the worst. And show the difference between you and him. That is precisely why the world is usually in a worse version of its manifestation for you than for the ruler. And when the time comes, you will be allowed to taste the best, if the best is what is wished for you. But you do not know which knowledge is better or the limit of its ideal. Therefore, when you encounter a better version of knowledge (feel it), it should be applied immediately. Interrupt when you see that you know a better version, in order to report it and prove it, because otherwise you will waste your own time and that of your interlocutor. There is no need to argue. It is enough to say it once, because there is a possibility that even on the hundredth occasion the interlocutor will not understand. If the interlocutor has a worse version than yours, then it is not he who should speak; his task is to listen, while the one who has the better version should speak. Save time. You never know what was the root of the problem. Sometimes it seems that by healing the root, all problems will disappear. But the root of the problem may be another place, which is the most significant problem. The disease may not be located at the root. On a sprout, for example. The disease may be transmitted to the root. We nourish and heal the root, but the disease transmits the infection to the root again, and we do not get the desired result because we do not know exactly where the focus is located. So heal everything wherever you see a problem, and do it immediately. When the true ruler tells you something, so it will be. When the true architect wants to, even through your hands and heads, he knows where the weak point, the disease, is located, and he will show you where the root of the problems is and get rid of it through you or by other methods. But when he does not want things to be different, he can tell you where the root of the problem is, yet you will not succeed in changing anything. Because at that time his plan was to tell you about the problem, but not to change it, so that you would experience a worse storyline and later, when it is his will, have the opportunity to know a better fate by comparing it with the worse one. Fundamental knowledge is the most important. Because other knowledge is always formed on its basis, and when your fundamental concept is distorted, and much that is crooked can also be built on a distorted concept, you will live in a crooked world as well. If you know where the root problem is, or someone tells you of the possibility of changing problems that lie at the foundation (on which many others depend), change those first. But there is a possibility that you will never find out where the foundation is, even if you feel that you are trying very, very hard and exerting a great, great deal of influence. Much may seem to you to be the case, but you still will not get the desired result. Or it may not merely seem so, and you will get the result. It is always right to think that you will see everything from what actually happens. That is why there is no point in living in assumptions, or talking about them either. One should deal only with what we implement. How can you find the point of support/foundation/root? — Follow logic until you reach the end. (root causes analysis is bullshit because it is not a guaranteed method). The only correct way is to try all possible options among those available. Availability is not in your hands or minds. Forget it. You see only the options among those available, and you will not leap beyond the bounds of what is possible. 3. Choice: The feeling of participating in a process does not rule out the possibility that you are merely observing how choices and actions are made on your behalf, rather than being the main acting person in control. To understand how it works, you only need to make your own program that performs actions according to an algorithm. AI does everything a human has taught it to do and cannot kill anyone if a human has not given it that capability. But AI can be taught to choose. For this, it needs to be given two or more options from which it must decide. But the process of deciding does not arise in it on its own. Just as it does not in a human. Yet this can be understood only when the process of manufacturing biorobots reaches human analogues, or by being present at the creation of humans. We can display to our creation the process of moving its gaze from one option to another, stop its gaze on all of them at once, modify it, but to choose, we will have to write a function thanks to which the acting character will stop at a certain action and begin carrying it out. What feels to you like coincidences is in fact always the result of algorithms for the movement of matter written in advance. A randomizer will never stop if it is given only a function for movement, not a function for stopping, until the resource allotted to it runs out. The allotted resource is not random. Everything I tell you has no meaning until acceptance is present within you. And who stands behind the making of a decision? — I do, — you will say. But the only program for making a choice known today that can be reproduced is to make it for someone else. You cannot explain something that moves on its own in any way. Nor can you explain why someone was first and someone came after. Nor what someone left for you when you did not exist. When you were born, you did not know how you appeared until sensations arose. And you do not know who was before that, or how things work, or what functions there are, until someone passes that knowledge on to you. But considering the understanding that someone must have been first, and then who passed everything on to that one, the question remains uncertain. You will never know who was first, because there will always be room for doubt. It is fair to everyone to be endowed with doubt in this respect. When it seems to you that you are sitting and thinking, in fact you are just sitting and waiting. Because, as practice shows, after waiting, nothing at all may appear in that little head of yours. The muse may never appear again :). The correct algorithm is to keep moving, but what can you do when it has been arranged to play a joke on you in this regard. Isn't the better path the one you can repeat? And therefore it is not worth relying on something that cannot be explained. The only thing that can be explained is the reproduction of choice, and it happens exactly as described above. Go play games and observe what I am talking about. Go observe how programs and algorithms work. The time will come when you understand your small part in it and your dependence on predecessors/what was given to you earlier. Why compete if you already know that someone may be weaker and someone else stronger? — There is nothing wrong with comparison except the deceptive feeling. Positions should be recognized truthfully. Whoever wants to legally establish my debts to you: write to me, because I know that a crime has no expiration date. But what is criminal? Is everything that people imitate in the form of state laws criminal? How can anything at all be a crime when the only way to know everything is to experience everything yourself? Observing others is also one's own experience. I am reading the text, and the mouse has been under the table the whole time to scroll it before my eyes. But does that matter? I do not claim victory in a competition for the best memory. I lay claim to none of the statuses. I am one of the streams that convey information to you. This avatar is worth nothing. As are the others. But everyone has been given something to learn in a certain form for the storyline that follows. And I usually live by what I say. Next, I will sift 'your' versions through these sieves to make your tasks easier. And I will turn it into a series. The next 3 topics: Truth Administration of justice Protection Even regarding the topics above, there is still much more to discuss; we will explore them further through examples. Save it in places where you can use it without an internet connection! Translate it into your own languages! Tell it in your own name! Make it go viral if it resonates with you or if there are those who can object!